Trending stocks

Bombay Burmah Trading Corp reports 41.0% EBITDA growth in 2016 and 2.9 pp EBITDA Margin growth from 10.5% to 13.4%

28-05-2016 • About Bombay Burmah Trading Corp ($BBTC) • By InTwits

Bombay Burmah Trading Corp reported FY2016 financial results today. Here are the key drivers of the company's long term financial model:
  • Bombay Burmah Trading Corp is a growth stock: FY2016 revenue growth was 10.3%, 5 year revenue CAGR was 12.0% at FY2016 ROIC 31.0%
  • EBITDA Margin is expanding: 13.4% in FY2016 vs. 10.5% in FY2015 vs. 6.0% in FY2012
  • Bombay Burmah Trading Corp has low CAPEX intensity: 5 year average CAPEX/Revenue was 3.1%. At the same time it's in pair with industry average of 3.6%
  • CAPEX is quite volatile: ₹2,811m in FY2016, ₹4,488m in FY2015, ₹9,924m in FY2014, ₹5,139m in FY2013, ₹6,186m in FY2012
  • The company has highly profitable business model: ROIC is 31.0%
Below you can find a comprehensive analysis of the key data driving the company's performance and the stock price.

Revenue and profitability


Bombay Burmah Trading Corp's Revenue jumped on 10.3%. Revenue growth happened at the same time with EBITDA margin expansion. EBITDA Margin increased on 2.9 pp from 10.5% to 13.4% in FY2016. EBITDA Margin grew at 1.9 pp per annum in the last 5 years.

Net Income margin showed almost no change in FY2016.

Investments (CAPEX, working capital and M&A)


Bombay Burmah Trading Corp's CAPEX/Revenue was 3.1% in FY2016. CAPEX/Revenue showed almost no change from FY2013 to FY2016. For the last three years the average CAPEX/Revenue was 2.3%. During FY2012-FY2016 CAPEX as a % of Revenue bottomed in FY2015 at 1.6%.

Return on investment


The company operates at high and attractive ROIC (31.0%) and ROE (22.1%). ROIC increased on 7.3 pp from 23.7% to 31.0% in FY2016. ROE decreased on 2.9 pp from 25.0% to 22.1% in FY2016. ROIC stuck to a growing trend at 5.0 pp per annum in FY2012-FY2016.

Leverage (Debt)


Debt level is 0.5x Net Debt / EBITDA and 0.7x Debt / EBITDA. Net Debt / EBITDA dropped on 0.1x from 0.7x to 0.5x in FY2016. Debt decreased on 9.8% while cash dropped on 57.9%. Net Debt/EBITDA declined at -0.6x per annum in FY2012-FY2016.

Bombay Burmah Trading Corp has short term refinancing risk: cash is only 26.7% of short term debt.

Management team


Bombay Burmah Trading Corp's CFO Amit Chhabra has spent 4 years with the company.

Financial and operational results


Bombay Burmah Trading Corp ($BBTC) key annual financial indicators

mln. INR201220132014201520162016/2015
P&L
Revenue59,27665,18872,71281,96790,42710.3%
SG&A7,418
EBITDA3,5284,4156,2878,61312,14341.0%
Net Income2,3021,3232,0713,5693,8106.8%
Balance Sheet
Cash2,0401,8511,4793,0841,297-57.9%
Short Term Debt6,6105,4522,9863,7694,86629.1%
Long Term Debt5,9204,2164,8845,0623,096-38.8%
Cash flow
Capex2,8132,3461,6471,2712,847124.0%
Ratios
Revenue growth15.7%10.0%11.5%12.7%10.3%
EBITDA growth10.2%25.2%42.4%37.0%41.0%

EBITDA Margin6.0%6.8%8.6%10.5%13.4%2.9%
SG&A, % of revenue8.2%
Net Income Margin3.9%2.0%2.8%4.4%4.2%-0.1%
CAPEX, % of revenue4.7%3.6%2.3%1.6%3.1%1.6%

ROIC10.7%13.9%20.6%23.7%31.0%7.3%
ROE23.1%11.8%17.0%25.0%22.1%-2.9%
Net Debt/EBITDA3.0x1.8x1.0x0.7x0.5x-0.1x

Peers in Tea & Coffee


Below we provide Bombay Burmah Trading Corp benchmarking against other companies in Tea & Coffee industry for the last 5 years. We show data for the top-5 companies by key financial metric together with the median value for all the companies in the industry.

Top companies by Revenue growth, %

Top 5 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016
Ccl Products (India) ($CCL)-29.6%10.2%22.8%5.9%
Diana Tea Co ($DIANATEA)-12.6%-11.1%9.9%11.6%-
Goodricke Group ($GOODRICKE)17.5%7.4%4.3%9.9%-
Tata Coffee ($TATACOFFEE)-7.3%-3.0%5.1%4.2%
Tata Global Beverages ($TATAGLOBAL)-10.4%4.8%4.9%-18.3%
 
Median (10 companies)13.9%8.9%8.9%4.8%5.0%
Bombay Burmah Trading Corp ($BBTC)-10.0%11.5%12.7%10.3%


Top companies by EBITDA margin, %

Top 5 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016
Ccl Products (India) ($CCL)20.3%20.1%21.5%20.6%22.0%
Tata Coffee ($TATACOFFEE)12.8%19.2%19.9%20.2%17.7%
B & A ($BNALTD)18.4%17.1%17.1%14.8%-
Rossell India ($ROSSELLIND)31.0%27.5%26.5%14.7%-
Tata Global Beverages ($TATAGLOBAL)9.5%10.6%9.9%9.7%10.0%
 
Median (9 companies)11.1%17.4%18.5%9.7%10.0%
Bombay Burmah Trading Corp ($BBTC)6.0%6.8%8.6%10.5%13.4%


Top companies by CAPEX/Revenue, %

Top 5 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016
Rossell India ($ROSSELLIND)11.0%6.7%14.8%11.1%-
Mcleod Russel India ($MCLEODRUSS)10.0%6.0%9.4%9.8%-
Tata Coffee ($TATACOFFEE)3.2%4.3%4.0%3.6%3.6%
Andrew Yule & Company ($ANDREWYU)2.8%1.8%2.4%2.9%-
Ccl Products (India) ($CCL)11.1%5.8%8.3%2.4%9.4%
 
Median (6 companies)4.5%3.5%3.3%3.3%3.3%
Bombay Burmah Trading Corp ($BBTC)4.7%3.6%2.3%1.6%3.1%


Top companies by ROIC, %

Top 5 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016
Ccl Products (India) ($CCL)16.1%18.0%19.7%23.0%25.7%
Tata Coffee ($TATACOFFEE)10.9%16.2%14.0%14.0%11.5%
Tata Global Beverages ($TATAGLOBAL)8.2%9.6%8.1%8.0%6.5%
Rossell India ($ROSSELLIND)-12.1%12.7%4.1%-
Andrew Yule & Company ($ANDREWYU)4.0%3.7%6.5%2.6%-
 
Median (13 companies)10.9%14.2%13.4%6.0%9.0%
Bombay Burmah Trading Corp ($BBTC)10.7%13.9%20.6%23.7%31.0%


Top companies by Net Debt / EBITDA

Top 5 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016
Mcleod Russel India ($MCLEODRUSS)0.4x0.5x0.7x4.2x-
Rossell India ($ROSSELLIND)0.0x1.9x1.5x2.6x-
Tata Coffee ($TATACOFFEE)3.6x2.6x2.7x2.5x2.7x
Andrew Yule & Company ($ANDREWYU)2.1x5.4x1.9x1.7x-
Ccl Products (India) ($CCL)2.6x2.3x1.7x1.1x0.7x
 
Median (9 companies)1.4x1.7x0.4x1.1x1.3x
Bombay Burmah Trading Corp ($BBTC)3.0x1.8x1.0x0.7x0.5x